Friday, February 28, 2025

The Oval Office

It is disgraceful and shameful--the ganging-up on President Zelenskyy in the Oval Office today, by President Trump and Vice President Vance.

I am reminded of a comment by Vance, in February of 2022--when Russian troops were poised to attack Ukraine. 

Vance, at the time, was running for a seat in the U.S. Senate, to represent Ohio, and said this, on Steve Bannon's "War Room" podcast, five days before the Russian invasion began:

"I gotta be honest with you, I don't really care what happens to Ukraine one way or another."

Monday, February 24, 2025

All in, with Putin

Today is the third anniversary of Russia's murderous invasion of Ukraine.

On this day--tragically--the United States sided with Russia, at the United Nations.

A headline, today, from The Washington Post: "U.S. votes against U.N. resolution condemning Russia for Ukraine war."

For some time, of course, we've known of Trump's peculiar, and dangerous, affection for Putin.

Last week Trump called Ukraine President Zelenskyy  a "dictator."  He said that Ukraine "should have never started" the war in 2022.  

A few days later, he revised the latter remark--but still blamed Ukraine and the United States for the war.  As Reuters reported, on February 21st:  

"Russia attacked, but they shouldn't have let him attack," Trump said, adding that...Zelenskyy and then-U.S. President Joe Biden should have taken steps to avert the invasion.

The same Reuters report noted this:  "Speaking at a White House event earlier on Friday, Trump was critical of Zelenskyy while refraining from negative comments about Putin."  The report continued: "I've had very good talks with Putin, and I've had not such good talks with Ukraine," Trump said.  "They don't have any cards, but they're playing tough."

In his September 2024 ABC News debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, during the presidential campaign, Trump refused to say if he wanted to see Ukraine win the war. 

DAVID MUIR (to Trump): Your time is up. Just to clarify the question, do you believe it's in the U.S. best interests for Ukraine to win this war? Yes or no?

FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: I think it's in the U.S. best interest to get this war finished and just get it done...Negotiate a deal. Because we have to stop all of these human lives from being destroyed.

On February 13th, he said he wanted Russia readmitted to the G7; Russia was removed from the group after its 2014 annexation of Crimea. "I'd love to have them back," Trump said.

A February 20th report about the G7 in The New York Times said: "The United States is opposing calling Russia the aggressor in the war with Ukraine in a Group of 7 statement being drafted to mark the third anniversary of Russia's full-scale invasion, three senior officials from countries involved said..."

A February 19th story in the Times said this:  

Mr. Trump also suggested that future security of Ukraine would not be an American problem. "This War is far more important  to Europe than it is to us," he wrote [on social media]. "We have a big, beautiful Ocean as separation."

On Saturday, February 22nd--this from the Associate Press--Trump told an audience at CPAC (the conservative political organization), of the fighting in Ukraine: "It affects Europe.  It doesn't really affect us."

For Trump, it comes down to his seemingly limitless desire to please Putin.

And it comes down, for him--as it so often does--to money. 

Trump wants Ukraine--a country in the midst of a war, fighting to survive--to repay the United States for the aid it has provided Ukraine, by forcing Ukraine to sign over hundreds of billions of dollars worth of minerals and other of Ukraine's natural resources--far more in value, it has been reported, than what the U.S. has in actuality given Ukraine.

Trump addressed the issue of reimbursement this weekend, at the CPAC conference in Washington.  The Times reported:

“I think we’re pretty close to a deal, and we better be close to a deal,” Mr. Trump told the Conservative Political Action Conference on Saturday evening, noting that he wanted payback for past American military and financial assistance to Ukraine. He also said, “We’re asking for rare earth and oil — anything we can get.”

Trump said, today, as noted by the Times: "It was a lot of money and we had nothing to show for it."

Other than the fact that America--Trump clearly can't conceive of this--was making a noble and moral choice (joined by a broad international coalition) to side with an ally, against a ruthless dictator--a dictator for whom Trump, now back in power, is stripping away, surrendering, America's moral leadership.

Saturday, February 22, 2025

Early TV theatres, tickets, studios, & Misc. images

I have written previously, in this space (and in my book about early television), about theatres in New York City, which, during the period of early TV, were refurbished to accommodate television productions.

The subject of such theatres is not, I think, an insignificant detail, concerning the era. 

Early television (and in particular the live aspect of so much of early TV programming) was, really, a unique variant of theatre:  theatre which was brought into the home--in the form, for example, of live dramas, musical programs, comedy shows, variety shows. 

In my book, I quoted Abel Green and Joe Laurie, Jr. who wrote the 1951 book Show Biz: From Vaude to Video (Doubleday)--meaning, of course, from vaudeville to television; Mr. Green was the longtime editor of the entertainment publication Variety.  They wrote of the "closer affinity of video with the stage, rather than with Hollywood..."  I also cited a 1951 interview with Helen Hayes, who said, of TV's dramatic programs, that television "has many attributes of the stage, including a very important one which Hollywood lacks--the necessity of a sustained performance."

In 1984, I interviewed Diane Sinclair, who had been a longtime dancer on Broadway. She and partner Ken Spaulding, a dance veteran who had also performed in Broadway shows, became a popular dance team in early television--on the shows of bandleader Kay Kyser, Paul Winchell, Dave Garroway, and others. 

In our conversation, Ms. Sinclair compared early TV with the Broadway stage--in that many shows in early television, as on Broadway, were subject to a sense of confinement: shows which were limited to a single, or perhaps a few, sets.  In later years, she pointed out, television shows--filmed programs--were able to leave the confines of the studio, and at that point, she felt, TV began to resemble Hollywood, as opposed to Broadway. 

And so, let me turn to the subject of theatres which housed various early television programs.

It is of course true that many TV programs, during this period, were broadcast from regular television studios. But the use of Manhattan theatres, by certain shows, no doubt contributed to--or, perhaps, served as a pleasing adjunct to--the ambiance, the theatre-like feeling, of early television.

Diane Sinclair and Ken Spaulding became the dance team on Kay Kyser's program in early 1950. Before joining Mr. Kyser's program, neither Ms. Sinclair or Mr. Spaulding had ever appeared on a television program. 

Prior to their first appearance on Mr. Kyser's show, the College of Musical Knowledge--the appearance was, in fact, an audition to become the program's weekly dance team--Ms. Sinclair went to a telecast of the show, which originated at Manhattan's International Theatre, at Columbus Circle. The theatre had been converted by NBC, in 1949, into a television facility, and seated, for its TV shows, some one thousand people. 

This was the first time Ms. Sinclair had seen a television program in person. "It was very exciting," she told me in 1984. "It was like seeing a Broadway show."

I know of one comedy and variety TV program, NBC's Four Star Revue (telecast from New York's palatial Center Theatre at Rockefeller Center), which provided Playbill-like programs to audience members, adding to the sense of TV-as-theatre.  During its 1950-1951 season, four stars took turns hosting the program (thus the show's title)--Ed Wynn, Danny Thomas, Jimmy Durante, and Jack Carson. (The next year, additional hosts were added, and the program was renamed the All Star Revue.) 

For its NBC broadcasts, the Center Theatre--after its 1950 conversion to a television facility--seated some two thousand people.

Here are a couple of images from the four-page program for the Four Star Revue's debut broadcast, in October 1950, with Ed Wynn.


 


 



 

 

 

 

 


 

 


 

 

 

 


While many programs on the DuMont Television Network were telecast either from the auditorium of Wanamaker's Department Store in Manhattan (the auditorium had been modified for television productions), or from studios at the network's headquarters on Madison Avenue, the network also leased space at two Broadway theatres--the Adelphi, and the Ambassador--for some of its TV productions. 

The Morey Amsterdam Show, which became a DuMont program in 1949, was telecast from the Adelphi Theatre, as was Jackie Gleason's Cavalcade of Stars, from 1950 to 1952.  

One of the DuMont Network's most prominent programs, Bishop Fulton J. Sheen's Life is Worth Living, was also telecast from the Adelphi Theatre; Bishop Sheen's program made its debut in 1952.

Yet--to the best of my knowledge--most of the early television programs originating from Manhattan theatres were from the comedy, music, variety (and related) realms.

Kay Kyser's TV program--as mentioned above--was broadcast from the International Theatre, at Columbus Circle.

The program--featuring quiz, comedy, music, and dance--had previously been heard for years on radio.

The TV show aired for two seasons: the first season began at the start of December 1949 and continued until late June of 1950. Its second season began the first week of October 1950, and ended at the close of December 1950.  My mother, Sue Bennett, was one of the show's featured singers, during both seasons.

Not long after the show ended, Kay Kyser, at forty-five years old, retired from show business; he moved with his family to North Carolina, his home state. He had had a long and exceptionally successful show business career, with his orchestra--on radio, in stage shows, on records, in movies, and then, lastly, on his network television show.

Here is a ticket from the TV show's final broadcast:



 

 

 

Beginning in January, of 1951, my mother began appearing as a guest on various network programs--such as Van Camp's Little Show (after its sponsor, the Stokely-Van Camp food company), a fifteen-minute NBC musical program starring singer and actor John Conte. She sang on the program regularly during 1951. The program was telecast Tuesday and Thursday evenings, from NBC's headquarters at 30 Rockefeller Center, without a studio audience.

Later, in 1951, she became a regular guest on The Freddy Martin Show, starring Mr. Martin and his orchestra, and featuring vocalist Merv Griffin (the program was also known as The Hazel Bishop Show, after its lipstick sponsor).  It was telecast from the Center Theatre.

Below is a ticket from a January, 1951 telecast of The Paul Winchell and Jerry Mahoney Show, on NBC--also known, because of its wristwatch-band sponsor, as The Speidel Show. It starred  ventriloquist Winchell; Jerry Mahoney was his sidekick "dummy." The Winchell and Mahoney program, like the Kay Kyser program, originated from the International Theatre; it had begun airing in September of 1950. 

As the ticket for the show indicates, part of the program featured a quiz segment, titled "What's My Name?" In February and March of 1951, my mother made two guest appearances on Mr. Winchell's program. Cast members on the show, by this time, included announcer Ted Brown, who also --from the handful of early 1951 kinescopes I have seen of The Speidel Show--took turns with Mr. Winchell, as M.C. of the show's quiz segments. Mr. Brown had been the announcer for the second season of Kay Kyser's TV program.

Beginning in 1951, the show also featured the dance team of Sinclair & Spaulding, from Mr. Kyser's program.

Here are two images from a 1951 kinescope of The Speidel Show.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

The last ticket, here, is for the NBC radio version of the musical program Your Hit Parade; the ticket is from January of 1951, the month before my mother became a Hit Parade cast member. The radio show had aired since 1935.

Both the radio and TV versions of the show, from the fall of 1950 to the beginning of July 1951 (the first season of the TV program), were broadcast Saturday nights from the Center Theatre. The radio show--employing the same vocal cast as the TV show, and the same orchestra, led by Raymond Scott--aired for a half-hour, beginning at 9 p.m. The Hit Parade TV show then aired from 10:30 to 11;00 p.m. 

(At the start of the following radio and TV seasons--1951 to 1952--the radio program and the TV show became separate entities. The radio version--while still broadcast by NBC from the Center Theatre, and still sponsored by Lucky Strike--moved from Saturday to Thursday nights, and starred Guy Lombardo and his orchestra, with Mr. Lombardo's vocalists; the radio show, each week, also featured a guest female singer. The radio show was heard on NBC until the start of 1953, when it went off the air.)

For several weeks, during the 1951-1952 TV season, the Hit Parade moved to NBC's Studio 8-H, at Rockefeller Center (which for many years had been the radio home of NBC's Symphony Orchestra, led by conductor Arturo Toscanini--and years later would become the home of Saturday Night Live). Yet the Hit Parade, for the 1951-1952 season, remained, otherwise, at the Center Theatre. 

After a few years at the theatre, the show returned to Studio 8-H and continued its broadcasts there until the end of the 1956-1957 season--at which time the program underwent a cast overhaul, and moved, in the fall of 1957 (for its final NBC season) to an NBC studio in Brooklyn. 

As the television-related website "Eyes of a Generation" has noted, the network, at this time, had two Brooklyn studios.  One of them, purchased from Warner Brothers in 1951, began television operations in 1954.  The second studio, built by NBC, began operating in 1956.

(Images of The Speidel Show, copyright NBCUniversal, Inc.)

Thursday, February 20, 2025

A brief video about the S.S.U.S.

At the top of The New York Times article, below, there is a brief video about the S.S. United States, which includes images of the ship shortly after it was moved from its berth on the Philadelphia waterfront.

Please note, for your reference: an unrelated video will likely play after the conclusion of the S.S.U.S. video.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/19/us/ss-united-states-final-voyage.html?unlocked_article_code=1.yk4.XiI2.1x6yWENmWcnF&smid=url-share

Wednesday, February 19, 2025

S.S. United States: on its way

The S.S. United States finally left its berth on the Philadelphia waterfront today, moved by tugboats.  It is now on its way to its second-to-last stop: Mobile, Alabama.  Ultimately, it will be brought to the west coast of Florida.

Here is a video from the S.S. United States Conservancy's' Facebook page; it shows the ship on the Delaware River, passing under the Walt Whitman Bridge, which connects Philadelphia and Camden County, New Jersey.  The ship is best seen beginning at about 51 minutes into the video.

https://www.facebook.com/SSUSC/videos/507636859069707/

Below, as well, is a postcard of the ocean liner, which I've had for some time--date unknown (though probably not that long after the ship's 1952 maiden voyage. The description, on the postcard's reverse side, refers to the "New flagship of the United States Lines").

I am unsure if the image is a colorized (and additionally altered) photograph--or if it is an artist's rendering.  Either way, it provides a good sense of the impressiveness, the grandeur, of the S.S. United States, during the years (1952-1969) that it was in service.







Monday, February 17, 2025

Another ship update

Because of continuing high winds, Tuesday's towing of the S.S. United States--during which the ocean liner was to be moved from Philadelphia's Pier 80, and begin its journey on the Delaware River, toward Alabama---has again been postponed. 

This second phase of the ship's towing is now scheduled to begin on Wednesday (February 19th).

From the Facebook page of the S.S. United States Conservancy:

Tugboats are now expected to maneuver the SS United States out into the Delaware River channel two to three hours before low tide. She will then proceed down river at approximately 12:51 pm.

https://www.facebook.com/SSUSC

Saturday, February 15, 2025

Update: the S.S. United States

The first phase of the transport of the S.S. United States from Philadelphia to Mobile, Alabama was successful; it took place on Friday.

The ship was moved by tugboats, laterally, from Pier 82, on the Philadelphia waterfront, to Pier 80.

The next part of the journey--moving the ocean liner from Pier 80 into the Delaware River channel, to begin its approximately two-week trip to Alabama--was planned for Monday.  It has been announced--by Florida's Okaloosa County, which now owns the ship--that this next (and more dramatic) phase of the trip has been delayed by one day, until Tuesday.

The County, as reported on the Facebook page of the S.S. United States Conservancy, said that "excessive high winds," predicted for the Greater Philadelphia area on Monday, are responsible for the delay. 

The towing of the ship is now scheduled to begin just after 12;00 p.m. on Tuesday.  

https://www.facebook.com/SSUSC

Thursday, February 13, 2025

The S.S. United States' planned Friday departure

The process of moving the S.S. United States ocean liner, by tugboats, from Philadelphia to a dock in Mobile, Alabama--before it is ultimately moved to Florida--is scheduled to begin tomorrow (Feb. 14th).

The ship is now owned by Okaloosa County, in Florida.  It is to be sunk, off of the Florida coast, becoming the world's largest artificial reef.  The process, in Alabama, of preparing the ship for sinking is expected to take approximately a year.

The ship was scheduled to be moved from Philadelphia's waterfront in November, but the possibility of storms in the Gulf of Mexico necessitated a postponement.  There was, later, an additional delay, prompted by the U.S. Coast Guard.  The Coast Guard had questions about the ship's physical integrity--seeking to insure it was capable of making the journey to Alabama.  Those concerns were addressed, to the Coast Guard's satisfaction.

Another delay occurred before February 8th, the day the ship was to be towed to another pier on the Philadelphia waterfront, prior to making the journey to Alabama.  

The additional delay, also prompted by the Coast Guard, involved this initial part of the process--moving the ship from Philadelphia's Pier 82 to nearby Pier 80.  Those concerns--requiring "additional due diligence involving further testing and safety protocols," according to the Facebook page of the S.S. United States Conservancy--were also addressed, and the process (at least as of this writing) is to begin at about noon on Friday. 

Children's book, "The Superliner United States" 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here, from the Conservancy's Facebook page, are the plans scheduled for tomorrow, and then for Monday, when the ship is expected to leave Pier 80, and begin what should be a two-week journey to Mobile:

-- Friday, February 14, 2025: At approximately 12:00 pm ET, tugboats will secure themselves to the SS United States at Pier 82 and maneuver the vessel to the north side of the slip in conjunction with high tide (at approximately 2:47 pm), where she will be secured to Pier 80.
 
-- Monday, February 17, 2025: Tugboats will maneuver the SS United States out into the Delaware River channel and then proceed with the tow down river at low tide at approximately 11:18 am. The ship will pass under various bridges, including the Walt Whitman Bridge (I-76), the Commodore Barry Bridge (U.S. 322), and the Delaware Memorial Bridge (I-295) along her route, with the Delaware River Port Authority (DRPA) coordinating bridge closures. 
 
During the SS United States' two-week tow along the eastern seaboard, Okaloosa's contractors will be utilizing real-time route planning, which will adjust the ship's course every 6-hours based on weather and currents. You can track the ship's course at https://www.destinfwb.com/explore/eco-tourism/ssus/.
For more details, visit https://conta.cc/3EOhVXp
 
Here is the link to the Conservancy's Facebook page:
 
 
(The children's book pictured above, "The Superliner United States," was written by J. Duncan Ford, and illustrated by A.K. Bilder.  The book, featuring on its cover a drawing of the ship--and accompanying tugboats--was published by Rand McNally & Company in 1953, the year following the ocean liner's maiden voyage.)

Satirist Andy Borowitz, on Robert Kennedy, Jr.

Robert Kennedy, Jr. was confirmed today, by the Senate, as the Secretary of H.H.S. Tulsi Gabbard was confirmed yesterday, as the Director of National Intelligence.  

Mitch McConnell was the only Republican Senator to vote against Kennedy and Gabbard.  He had also voted against the confirmation of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (along with Republicans Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins).

Andy Borowitz--the well-known satirist/humorist--wrote about Kennedy today, in his column "The Borowitz Report," which appears on the Substack platform. (For a number of years,"The Borowitz Report" had been featured in The New Yorker.)

The heading of today's darkly comic piece said this:

RFK Jr.'s Confirmation Hailed By National Alliance of Funeral Directors

Mr. Borowitz wrote:

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s confirmation as Health and Human Services Secretary on Thursday received a rousing thumbs-up from some of his most prominent supporters, the National Alliance of Funeral Directors.

"For years, the funeral industry has suffered as a result of the Democratic Party's unabashed anti-death agenda," the group said in an official statement. "We are confident that Secretary Kennedy will make death great again."

Monday, February 10, 2025

Tulsi Gabbard: "a walking Christmas tree of warning lights"

I cannot believe--it is stunning, and frightening--that Tulsi Gabbard appears to be on the verge of being approved, by the Republican-controlled Senate, as the Director of National Intelligence.

In a November 13, 2024 piece in The Atlantic, staff writer Tom Nichols wrote, pointedly:

"Her appointment would be a threat to the security of the United States."

Mr. Nichols wrote:

A person with Gabbard’s views should not be allowed anywhere near the crown jewels of American intelligence. I have no idea why Trump nominated Gabbard; she’s been a supporter, but she hasn’t been central to his campaign, and he owes her very little. For someone as grubbily transactional as Trump, it’s not an appointment that makes much sense. It’s possible that Trump hates the intelligence community—which he blames for many of his first-term troubles—so much that Gabbard is his revenge. Or maybe he just likes the way she handles herself on television.

Mr. Nichols wrote this:

Gabbard ran for president as a Democrat in 2020, attempting to position herself as something like a peace candidate. But she’s no peacemaker: She’s been an apologist for both the Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad and Russia’s Vladimir Putin. Her politics, which are otherwise incoherent, tend to be sympathetic to these two strongmen, painting America as the problem and the dictators as misunderstood.

Gabbard, he said,

is a classic case of “horseshoe” politics: Her views can seem both extremely left and extremely right, which is probably why people such as Tucker Carlson—a conservative who has turned into … whatever pro-Russia right-wingers are called now—have taken a liking to the former Democrat (who was previously a Republican and is now again a member of the GOP).

In early 2017, while still a member of Congress, Gabbard met with Assad, saying that peace in Syria was only possible if the international community would have a conversation with him. “Let the Syrian people themselves determine their future, not the United States, not some foreign country,” Gabbard said, after chatting with a man who had stopped the Syrian people from determining their own future by using chemical weapons on them. Two years later, she added that Assad was “not the enemy of the United States, because Syria does not pose a direct threat to the United States,” and that her critics were merely “warmongers.”

Mr. Nichols wrote this, as well:

Gabbard has every right to her personal views, however inscrutable they may be. As a private citizen, she can apologize for Assad and Putin to her heart’s content. But as a security risk, Gabbard is a walking Christmas tree of warning lights.  https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2024/11/tulsi-gabbard-nomination-security/680649/?gift=Tcay7nmVziC9n3Jf9QllmzEmtmaqldM0iAVdy4OyATA&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share

https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2024/11/tulsi-gabbard-nomination-security/680649/https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2024/11/tulsi-gabbard-nomination-security/680649/?gift=Tcay7nmVziC9n3Jf9QllmzEmtmaqldM0iAVdy4OyATA&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharehttps://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2024/11/tulsi-gabbard-nomination-security/680649/?gift=Tcay7nmVziC9n3Jf9QllmzEmtmaqldM0iAVdy4OyATA&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharehttps://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2024/11/tulsi-gabbard-nomination-security/680649/?gift=Tcay7nmVziC9n3Jf9QllmzEmtmaqldM0iAVdy4OyATA&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share

https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2024/11/tulsi-gabbard-nomination-security/680649/?gift=Tcay7nmVziC9n3Jf9QllmzEmtmaqldM0iAVdy4OyATA&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share

Monday, February 3, 2025

The changing media universe

The Star-Ledger, which has long been, in its circulation, New Jersey's largest daily newspaper, has now become an online-only publication.

The last hard-copy edition of the paper, which is based in Newark, in northern New Jersey, was published yesterday (February 2nd); the coming change had been announced in October.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Star-Ledger

The front page of The Star-Ledger's Sunday's edition

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Star-Ledger's Editorial Board has been disbanded, with the demise of the paper's print edition.  In its final editorial, on Sunday, the Board noted this:

More than 3,200 print papers – most of them weeklies -- have vanished since 2005, according to Northwestern University. Once upon a time, in what historians call the pre-TikTok Era, such events were alarming, but now newspapers disappear at a rate of more than two per week, victims of a seismic shift in a media landscape dominated by internet behemoths that produce little content but vacuum up most of the revenue.

https://www.nj.com/opinion/2025/02/lights-out-a-final-word-from-njs-only-editorial-board.html

Two of The Star-Ledger's daily sister publications, The Times of Trenton, and The South Jersey Times, also became, yesterday, online-only papers. An affiliated weekly, The Hunterdon County Democrat, became online-only on January 30th.

Another of the Star-Ledger's sister publications, The Jersey Journal, ceased publication entirely on Saturday.  The Journal served northern New Jersey's Hudson County.  

The Journal's farewell editorial, on Saturday, included the following:

In our first issue [in 1867] founders Z.K. Pangborn and William Dunning promised to be “frank and fearless, neither dreading the displeasure, nor fawning for the favor of anybody.” The Journal itself may not be here after today, but we hope that promise will continue to inspire Hudson County for decades to come.

https://www.nj.com/opinion/2025/02/what-the-journal-stood-for-the-good-fight-will-continue-jersey-journal-editorial.html