Wednesday, November 11, 2026

The S.S. United States

I have written many times in this space about the S.S. United States, the legendary ocean liner which began carrying passengers in 1952, and went out of service in 1969.

The ship was sunk today in the Gulf of Mexico, twenty-two nautical miles southwest of Destin-Fort Walton Beach, cities on Florida's western coast. 

Destin and Fort Walton Beach are part of Okaloosa County, which purchased the ship in 2024 from the S.S. United States Conservancy, a group dedicated for years to the ship's preservation, and to its history.

The sinking of the ship took place over a number of hours today; it finally sank from view shortly before 10 p.m. Eastern time.  

The ship will now become the world's largest artificial reef--providing a destination for divers, and a home for marine life. 

Here is a video, nearly five minutes long, showing some of the ship's final moments above water.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dADNg_ux1Z0

The ship went through different owners, through the years. 

When I toured the ship, in 2000, it was owned by businessman Edward Cantor, who had purchased it in 1997. By that time, most of the inside of the ship had been gutted.

It was docked on the Philadelphia waterfront between 1996 and 2025.

In 2003, after Mr. Cantor's death, the ship was purchased at an auction of Mr. Cantor's estate by the Norwegian Cruise Line company; Norwegian Cruise Line considered refurbishing the ship and returning it to service.  The plans were later abandoned.

In 2011, the S.S. United States Conservancy bought the ship from NCL's parent company--with the considerable financial help of H.F. "Gerry" Lenfest, a noted Philadelphia-based philanthropist. 

For years, the Conservancy made significant efforts to save the ship--to seek partners to repurpose it, for example, as a stationary, multi-use facility.  Plans which were envisioned, over time, included an on-board hotel, and other hospitality-oriented spaces.  Office and business-related spaces, as well as cultural venues, were also considered.  

In the end, however, the efforts were unsuccessful.  The ship was then sold in October of 2024 to Florida's Okaloosa County. Over nearly two weeks, in February and March of 2025, the ocean liner was first towed, by tug boats, to Mobile, Alabama.  As Wikipedia notes: "While in Mobile, the ship underwent an extensive remediation process"--which included the removal of elements and components of the ship which would likely prove environmentally harmful, upon its sinking.

As part of the agreement between the Conservancy and Okaloosa County, a museum about the ship will ultimately be built in the County.

And so, tonight, the ship--once magnificent (at 990+ feet, longer than the Titanic)--was sunk to the floor of the Gulf.

Sunday, November 8, 2026

The New Yorker, and the midterms

The November 16th issue of the magazine features a cover by the very talented Barry Blitt.  It is titled "Sea Change."













 

Françoise Mouly, The New Yorker's art editor, writes the following accompanying note about the drawing, which includes a quote from Mr. Blitt. 

For the cover of the November 16, 2026, issue, the artist Barry Blitt features six newly elected Democrats—James Talarico, Abdul El-Sayed, Keisha Lance Bottoms, Amy Acton, Troy Jackson, and Gina Hinojosa—joyfully riding the midterms’ blue wave. “As thrilled—and relieved!—as I am by the midterm election’s outcome, [Blitt says], the greatest relief is to finally have some new faces to draw.”

("Sea Change," © Barry Blitt, and The New Yorker.)

Monday, November 2, 2026

Courage

Donald Trump would like to see a lot of people--people he regards as his enemies--put in jail. 

It was reported in early October that his Justice Department was attempting to indict Cassidy Hutchinson, the former aide, during Trump's first term, to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.

Ms. Hutchinson came into public view because of her testimony, in 2022, before the House committee investigating the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.  Ms. Hutchinson--who, I believe, displayed great courage in testifying publicly--described what she witnessed, and what she was told about, before, during, and after the attack on the Capitol.

Last Tuesday, the indictment the government sought against her was rejected by a federal grand jury in Washington.

Cases the Trump Justice Department brought against James Comey and Letitia James--as part of Trump's campaign against his perceived enemies--were dismissed by a judge. Two grand juries later refused to re-indict Ms. James.  Another case brought against Mr. Comey--the "seashells case"--has not yet been resolved.  The Justice Department revealed this past week that it was pursuing new charges against Mr. Comey, concerning the alleged leaking of classified information a decade ago. 

Another case, of course, targeted six Democrats (two Senators and four House members) regarding a video they made which reminded service members that they were not required to follow illegal orders. All of the Democrats in the video had military or intelligence backgrounds. The case, Trump posted on social media after the video was released, constituted “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!” In early 2026, a grand jury in Washington declined to indict them.

Trump's retribution efforts, however, will no doubt continue.

They will continue, I think, for this reason:  it is that the man who wants to jail people he doesn't like, is himself a prisoner.  

He is a prisoner of his obsessions.  He is a prisoner of his resentments, his hatreds, his need to exact revenge. 

He can't let go of his defeat in the 2020 election. He is fixated upon "winning"; upon tariffs ("I always say 'tariffs' is the most beautiful word to me in the dictionary"); fixated upon defaming and vilifying immigrants, and does whatever he can to bring fear to the country's immigrant communities.  He is obsessed with presidents Obama and Biden, and talks about them at every opportunity; he is fixated upon Vladimir Putin and other dictators or autocrats, while routinely attacking America's allies.  He is obsessed with his building projects (the ballroom, the D.C. golf course, the Reflecting Pool, The Kennedy Center, the decorative changes to the White House and its grounds), at the expense of attentiveness to issues Americans are concerned about.

And he is obsessed, certainly, with criticisms he receives, or with the most basic questioning about his decisions and his words--from reporters, commentators, from governmental and political figures, former military figures, judges, prosecutors, protesters, comedians. He has often called the media "the enemy of the people." In a speech this past week, he said that the media was "the biggest threat" to the country. 

While he clearly enjoys power, I would suggest he is perhaps even more interested in control--seeking, for example, to control what is said about him, whether from the aforementioned press he despises, or from TV hosts such as Jimmy Kimmel.

Here is something Trump has said in varying forms, over time, which is deeply revealing. As he put it, this past July: "I only like people who like me." 

Those who he feels don't like him are, it is clear, the enemy.  

One thinks of the recent controversy concerning Vivek Ramaswamy, the Republican candidate for Governor in Ohio.

On Thursday, the Ramaswamy campaign took off the air the widely (and justifiably) condemned TV ad featuring the mother of the Democratic candidate in the race, Amy Acton.

Ramaswamy, who made billions of dollars during his business career, had said he would spend four million dollars running the ad; it appears that in the end, a little less than a million dollars was spent on the airing of it.

He defended the ad, while it aired--and made no apologies about it when announcing its end.  He said of the ad, on Thursday: "It ran to completion, and we've put up four other ads."

Ramaswamy ran for president during the 2024 Republican primary season, but dropped out after the Iowa caucuses.  Dr. Amy Acton is the former director of the Ohio Department of Health. 

I have, I will mention, no affection for Ramaswamy's politics, or his aggressive, combative political style.  

Yet based solely on his airing of the TV ad, Ramaswamy deserves to lose the Ohio election.  I hope he will lose by a mile.

It doesn't take courage to put up an ad like this.  It takes cynicism, cruelty, the disregarding of human feeling.

The courage, in this story, rests with Dr. Acton.

In 1978, when she was twelve years old, Amy Acton testified, before a grand jury, that her stepfather, Cledith "Bud" Arthur, had raped her. 

Dr. Acton has said that the rapes took place over a period of three years.

I cannot imagine what it must have been like, to testify before a grand jury, as a child, about being raped by her mother's husband. Yet I know that it must have taken great courage to do so.

Her stepfather was arrested, and indicted for rape.  He pleaded not guilty.

Her mother, Donna Arthur, is now 82.  Donna Arthur lost custody of Amy Acton and her younger brother, Philip, in 1978, at the time of the indictment; the children were removed from her home, and they began living with their biological father, who had been divorced from Acton's mother when Acton was three years old.

Dr, Acton is now sixty years old. The last time she saw and spoke with her mother was in 1978, at the courthouse in Ohio where her stepfather was indicted. 

Her stepfather never went to trial after his indictment. He fled the state, and Dr. Acton's mother, Acton's brother Philip has recently said, stayed with him, and remained married to him until his death in 2004 in Pennsylvania.

In the TV ad which aired, Dr. Acton's mother called her daughter a liar, and said, "she's lied her entire life," and therefore shouldn't be trusted to serve as governor.  The ad did not refer to the charge of rape against Acton's stepfather--although the publication Politifact has reported that in a 2020 interview with the anti-abortion group Operation Rescue, Donna Arthur said that Acton lied about her stepfather, and what she alleged took place in the 1970s.  In an October 23rd piece, New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg made note of a telling detail in Arthur's 2020 comments to Operation Rescue. Donna Arthur, Michelle Goldberg wrote, "speculated that Acton got the idea to say Bud Arthur raped her from his daughter from a previous marriage, who’d made a similar claim." (italics added)  

Governor Mike DeWine, a Republican, said, on October 22nd: "The ad, on its face, is deeply, deeply troubling.  It's wrong to run this ad." (Though Governor DeWine did not retract his previous endorsement of Ramaswamy.)  Ohio Senator Jon Husted said: "I would not have run that ad." 

Vice President JD Vance, however, attacked Republicans who criticized the ad, arguing they were "whining more about that advertisement than they are about what the congressional Democrats and other Democrats want to do to the United States of America." He also said: "Vivek Ramaswamy had the audacity to run a TV commercial which calls it out like it is and calls Amy Acton a liar."

Vance was obviously unconcerned about the morality of exploiting a family rupture, by using, in a TV ad, a mother, now 82 years old, who decades before had stood with her husband, after he was accused of raping her 12 year-old daughter.

And, of course, President Trump weighed in on the advertisement.  He wrote on social media, on October 22nd, that Ramaswamy "had put up a very powerful Ad."  He said that "Vivek should keep [the ad] up, and let everyone listen to the mother of a defective, dishonest, and incapable Candidate, explain how the daughter is a DISASTER who, uncontrollably, lies, cheats, and steals!"  He added:  "The Press is trying to convince everyone that the Ad is bad, because it's so good!  Who wouldn't use such an Ad? I would, it's called 'hitting pay dirt.'" 

I make note of the sinister, perverse nature of Trump's description of Dr. Acton as "defective." 

That she "lies, cheats, and steals!"--and does so "uncontrollably"?  Trump's insults, so often, seem to be an ongoing form of autobiography.

Trump wrote, on October 22nd, that Dr. Acton's mother was "brave," and that appearing in the ad "took a lot of courage to do."

The day before, as reported by the website MEDIAite, there was the following exchange outside The White House between Trump and a reporter.  The reporter said this:

"Ohio gubernatorial candidate Amy Acton is estranged from her mother after suffering sexual abuse as a child," a reporter noted to the president outside the White House on Wednesday.

"Where is this? Where?" Trump asked.

"In Ohio," the reporter clarified. "The governor candidate for Democrats, Amy Acton. Her mother is featured in an ad by Vivek Ramaswamy. She's estranged from her mother — "

"I don't know anything about it," Trump interjected. "I heard that there's something where his — her mother went against her. Uh, I don't know what that has to do with Vivek."

"She suffered from sexual abuse by her mother's husband," the reporter added.

"I just don't know that, and as you know — " the president continued.

"Was it appropriate to put that in a campaign ad?" the reporter wondered.

"If it was about a Republican, I can guarantee you they'd let it go, so that's why you're asking," Trump fired back. "The fact is, I know nothing about it, but I hear the mother went very rogue on the daughter, doesn't have a lot of respect for the daughter, and I think the mother is a witness to things, also. So, who knows? And you'll have to figure that out. It's a very unusual situation to have a mother hate a daughter that much, but I don't think that has anything to do with Vivek."

So: Trump claimed he was unaware of the story regarding Dr. Acton's stepfather ("I know nothing about it"), and didn't seem interested in looking into it--or having his people investigate the matter further.  Nonetheless, he clearly took Dr. Acton's mother's side--accepting at face value, giving credence to, the remarks she made in the ad. 

To Trump, it seems, the degree of hate expressed by Amy Acton's mother ("It's a very unusual situation to have a mother hate a daughter that much") provided confirmation, validation, of her truthfulness. 

The day after the above exchange with the press, Trump addressed reporters again, outside The White House.  As noted below, one of the questioners was the NBC News reporter Monica Alba.

From a story in the publication Deadline, on October 23rd:

Referring to the Ramaswany ad, Trump on Friday said, "A mother is saying, 'Don't put my daughter there because she's a terrible person and she's a liar. Why shouldn't somebody use that?"

NBC News' Monica Alba then asked him, "But do the sexual abuse allegations mean nothing to you?" Trump went on, but Alba continued to ask the question.

"Who are you with?" he asked her.

"I am with NBC sir," she responded.

"One of the worst networks you have," he said.

She continued to ask about the sexual abuse allegations, and Trump told her, "Quiet."

"Isn't she a fresh person? You're a horrible little reporter, aren't you?" Trump said.

Trump said, "If my mother said bad things about me, do you think the Democrats would put it up? I think so. But my mother thought I was wonderful." He looked up in the air and said, "Thank you, Mom."

He said of Acton's mother, "She said her daughter is a disaster. Her daughter is a liar. And she felt she had a obligation … I should be so lucky to have an ad like that."

He then asked Alba, "Why wouldn't you listen to a mother that says that? Why? Miss NBC, why wouldn't you listen?"

Alba responded, "She stayed with her stepfather."

"I don't know anything about her stepfather," Trump said.

He says he doesn't know--but if he does know, it obviously doesn't concern him.

Amy Acton is a Democrat.  That's all the information Trump evidently needs. Vivek Ramaswamy likes him, supports him, and so he likes Vivek Ramaswamy.  Dr. Acton, from what I have seen, has a genuine, humane quality to her. Yet she is just another enemy, to Trump (and to Ramaswamy, and Vance): someone to go after, someone to take down.

Friday, October 16, 2026

From New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman: "Trump’s Democracy-for-Diesel Deal Shames Us All"

The piece, by Mr. Friedman, appeared yesterday in the Times. 

Here are the initial paragraphs of the column:

If President Trump does not understand what will happen to him if he proceeds with his plan to trade away support for Ukraine’s democracy for Russian diesel, let me spell it out: He will enter the history books in the chapter on leaders who sold out their country’s democratic values to appease a dictator.

Donald Trump, meet Neville Chamberlain. When future students search online for “sellout,” “appeaser” or “traitor to his country’s core values,” their two pictures will come up first, side by side. And deservedly so. At least Chamberlain was trying, in what proved to be lethally misguided fashion, to avoid a world war. Trump is trying to avoid losing a few seats in Congress — and is likely to be no more successful in achieving his goal than Chamberlain was in achieving his.

I have never believed that Trump was somehow an agent of Russia’s leader, Vladimir Putin, or in his pay. It is much worse. He simply does not cherish democracy. He cherishes money. And he has no problem selling out the first for the second. When he acts in his own commercial interests, that’s his personal business. When he uses the American presidency to make a buck, it is our collective shame.

There is simply no core American value Trump will not sell out. Desperate to lower diesel prices, which are hurting Republicans in the midterms, Trump actually made a deal to import diesel fuel from Russia, even though it offers a potential windfall for the Kremlin so it can bomb Ukraine harder — and is unlikely to help lower prices or increase supplies much at all. Worse, his aides then asked Ukraine to refrain from attacks on Russia’s oil refineries, without Trump making the same demand of Putin regarding Ukraine’s energy infrastructure. It makes me sick to my stomach to even type this.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/15/opinion/trump-russia-oil-putin.html?unlocked_article_code=1.JFE.Km8T.wMURS5epxsff&smid=url-share

Wednesday, October 14, 2026

Ukraine, and Trump's immorality/amorality

Here is a piece by Anne Appelbaum, the noted writer, author, and foreign policy analyst, in the October 12th Atlantic, online.

The piece is titled "Trump's Message to Ukraine Is Now Crystal Clear"; its subtitle is, "The president's actions over the past 72 hours look like an effort to force Kyiv to surrender."

Trump--appearing now, overtly, to be all in with Vladimir Putin, while throwing President Zelenskyy, and the country he has tried to save, to the wolves.  

The immorality--and the amorality--of Trump's conduct regarding Russia's war against Ukraine, are staggering, tragic.

America's Golden Age, as Trump likes to proclaim?  It feels, too often, more like an age of nightmares.

Ms. Appelbaum's October 12th piece includes the following:

In the past 72 hours, Donald Trump has dropped all pretense, torched a couple decades of American policy, and undermined 18 months of his own diplomacy. He lifted sanctions on the import of Russian diesel fuel, in violation of the letter and spirit of laws that he himself signed. He has threatened to stop sharing intelligence with Ukraine, unless Ukraine agrees not to target Russian refineries, thus demanding that Kyiv give up its most effective weapon while asking nothing from Russia in exchange. He has not criticized Russian attacks on Ukrainian power plants or factories, even those owned by American companies. He has offered no condolences for the recent deaths of Ukrainian children in Russian bombing raids.

He has lied repeatedly. He declared that Ukraine and Russia had agreed to an “energy cease-fire,” an announcement that surprised the Ukrainians and that in any case the Russians immediately broke, hitting a power plant in Kharkiv only hours later. He accused Ukraine of blocking negotiations, when in reality the Ukrainians have repeatedly proposed cease-fires and Russia has never agreed to a cease-fire or any meaningful negotiation at all.

He has described Ukraine’s democratically elected president as an obstacle to negotiations and told him to leave office. But on Friday, before making these new decisions, he held yet another long, friendly telephone conversation with the Russian dictator, who really could end the war today. All Vladimir Putin has to do is tell his soldiers to stop fighting, and then the war is over. The Ukrainians cannot stop fighting because, if they do, their country will be conquered and they will suffer the fate of their occupied territories: leaders murdered, children kidnapped, repression and concentration camps for everyone else. If Trump knows this, then he does not care.

Here is the link to the full October 12th piece by Ms. Appelbaum:

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/10/trump-ukraine-putin-fuel/688974/?gift=Tcay7nmVziC9n3Jf9Qllm92bYGGHtIbjwfqAuyrwR48&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share

Friday, October 9, 2026

Livestreaming an execution

Defense Secretary Hegseth--announcing yesterday that Nidal Hasan, the radicalized Army psychiatrist who murdered thirteen soldiers at Texas's Fort Hood in 2009, and injured thirty-two others, would not only be executed in December by a firing squad, but that the execution would be livestreamed.

Trump, today, said he approved of the livestreaming.

Livestreaming an execution.  This is grotesque, and depraved.

From a New York Times story, today:

“We’ll make sure that people are able to watch it, that it’s public, because people need to understand there’s serious consequences for these types of things,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said [yesterday] in an interview with a conservative news outlet.

The Times reporter wrote:

No public execution has been conducted in the United States in 90 years, and the decision to conduct this one in front of an audience would put the country in the company of Afghanistan, Iran, North Korea and Somalia. Just 17 executions around the world were confirmed to be conducted publicly last year, according to Amnesty International: six in Afghanistan and 11 in Iran. Even Saudi Arabia, once known for hanging prisoners in public, has not conducted a public execution since 2022.

Even some supporters of capital punishment flinched at the idea of livestreaming Mr. Hasan’s execution, calling it medieval and barbaric. “Hasan should face the death penalty, but making his execution public and streaming it? Beyond disgusting,” said Senator Thom Tillis, Republican of North Carolina. “Public executions are what oppressive dictatorships like Iran and Afghanistan do. It should not be happening in America.”

Trump has been unable to win his gut-driven, impulsive, erratic war against the Islamic Republic of Iran, a war he said in March would last four to six weeks.  I am guessing--at least in part because of his inability, thus far, to bring the war to a successful conclusion--that both he and Hegseth are finding a perverse kind of pleasure in this planned livestreaming. The idea of the livestream--letting people across the world watch as the United States executes a mass murderer, a radicalized Muslim man--is hideous on its own terms.  Yet it feels, indeed, as though the announced December livestream is very possibly being used as a proxy for the administration's failures abroad.

(Please note: a few changes were made to the above in the hours after it was posted.)

Wednesday, October 7, 2026

2023

Three years ago, on this date, Hamas (joined by members of other terrorist groups, such as Palestinian Islamic Jihad) invaded Israel, murdering some 1200 people (more than 800 of them civilians), and kidnapping 251 others, taking them to Gaza, as hostages.