Sunday, July 28, 2024

The assassination attempt, and language

It has been a month of earthquakes.

June 27th:  the astonishing debate between President Biden and former President  Trump--which changed, immediately, the course of the presidential campaign.

July 13th:  the attempted assassination of the former President, in Butler, Pennsylvania.

And, on July 21:  the historic, and remarkable, decision by President Biden, to drop out of the presidential race--and his endorsement, shortly afterwards, of the candidacy of Vice President Harris.

About the assassination attempt:

It has been fifteen days since the terrible shootings in Butler. There was the injury to Mr. Trump.  And, the tragic death of firefighter Corey Comperatore--and the serious injuries to the two other rally attendees.

News reports, in the week after the shootings, noted that the gunman had searched, online, for images of Mr. Trump, and for dates of Mr. Trump's public appearances. He had also searched for images of President Biden, and the dates of the August Democratic convention. 

He had also made online searches about FBI Director Christopher Wray, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, and a British royal family member.

It was also reported that the gunman had looked up the subject of "major depressive disorder."

On Wednesday of this past week, FBI Director Christopher Wray revealed that a week before the attempted assassination, the gunman--chillingly--looked up the following, online: "How far away was Oswald from Kennedy?"

And yet: the motivations of the 20-year old gunman remain, at this writing, unknown. 

A July 17th New York Times story (later updated) reported that

the absence of “any political or ideological information” at the [Bethel Park, Pennsylvania] house [the gunman] shared with his mother and father was “notable” because most people who carry out acts of political violence tend to leave a discernible trail of political views, a top [FBI] bureau official told lawmakers.

The Times also noted, on July 17th, that FBI Director Wray "went out of his way to caution that the investigation was still in its early stages."

A CNN report, on July 19th, said this:

"One emerging theory by investigators, based in part on the timing and subjects of his online searches, is that the shooter was looking to carry out a mass shooting and that the Trump event’s proximity and timing offered the most ready opportunity, according to a US official briefed on the matter." 

So: if the above theory is ultimately proven correct (and it may not be), the shootings in Butler may not in fact have been driven by a particular fixation on or animus toward Mr. Trump--but may, in the end, have been opportunistic; the attack may have been carried out due to a terrible and shocking sense of convenience.

Nevertheless: soon after the tragic events in Butler, various Republicans blamed Democrats, and Mr. Biden himself, for the assassination attempt.  

They charged that Democratic rhetoric--such as, asserting that Mr. Trump is a singular threat to American democracy--led to the attack.

Senator JD Vance--who on July 13th had not yet been chosen as Mr. Trump's running mate--wrote on social media, the night of the shootings:

Today is not just some isolated incident. 

The central premise of the Biden campaign is that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs. 

That rhetoric led directly to President Trump's attempted assassination.

The "at all costs" comment from Mr. Vance was, I would suggest, insidious, in the reach of its implication. 

On Wednesday of this past week, as reported by USA Today, Mr. Trump, at a campaign rally in North Carolina, spoke of the assassination attempt.  The USA Today article said:

At one point, Trump suggested that the shooter was inspired by the rhetoric that he is a threat to democracy, although there is no evidence as to what exactly motivated the attack.

"It could be caused when they call you a 'threat to democracy,'" Trump said. "You never know what causes it."

That's right: sometimes you never know--despite Mr. Trump's suggestion, just prior, to the contrary.

The allegations about Democratic rhetoric are, to say the least, a bit rich. 

What happened in Butler was ghastly. It remains true, however, that Mr. Trump's threats to democracy--to the American electoral and governmental systems, and to those he regards as his political and ideological opponents and enemies--are genuine.  

It would be irresponsible, in the extreme, for Democrats to refrain from speaking of them.  

They most certainly should speak, for example, of Mr. Trump's attraction to and affection for autocrats, strongmen, dictators--Viktor Orban, Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong Un.

Mr. Trump clearly has dictator envy.

The allegations by Republicans about Democratic rhetoric ignore, of course, the routinely inflammatory, incendiary rhetoric that Mr. Trump has employed for years.  

David A. Graham, staff writer at The Atlantic, wrote on Dec. 7, 2023, of a speech given the month before by Mr. Trump in New Hampshire.  He quoted Mr. Trump's remarks (part of which were widely noted, at the time):

"We pledge to you that we will root out the Communists, Marxists, fascists, and the radical-left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country, that lie and steal and cheat on elections,” Donald Trump said this past November, in a campaign speech that was ostensibly honoring Veterans Day. “The real threat is not from the radical right; the real threat is from the radical left … The threat from outside forces is far less sinister, dangerous, and grave than the threat from within. Our threat is from within.”

Mr. Graham then commented: 

What immediately leaps out here is the word vermin, with its echoes of Hitler and Mussolini. But Trump’s inflammatory language can overshadow and distract from the substance of what he’s saying—in this case, appearing to promise a purge or repression of those who disagree with him politically.

On June 30th of this year, on his Truth Social platform, Trump shared posts by other Truth Social users.  

One was about former Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney. The second shared post contained a list of political figures--including, notably, former Vice President Pence--who, the post proclaimed, should be jailed.  

As CNN.com reported:

“ELIZABETH LYNNE CHENEY IS GUILTY OF TREASON,” one post created by [a Truth Social user] that Trump amplified...reads. “RETRUTH IF YOU WANT TELEVISED MILITARY TRIBUNALS.”

Cheney responded on X, “Donald - This is the type of thing that demonstrates yet again that you are not a stable adult—and are not fit for office.”

A separate post Trump [re-posted] on Truth Social Sunday includes photos of 15 former and current elected officials and says, “THEY SHOULD BE GOING TO JAIL ON MONDAY NOT STEVE BANNON!”

In addition to Biden and Harris, the post includes photos of Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, former Vice President Mike Pence and members of the House select committee that investigated the January 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol.

Mr. Trump's months-long vitriolic falsehoods about the 2020 election certainly paved the way for the riot and assault on the U.S. Capitol in January of 2021--which was accompanied by his obvious lack of interest, in the hours after the rioting began, in stopping the violence. 

He watched it all unfold on TV.  And, according to various reports, he was glad to see it happen.

In February of 2021, Republican Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, of Washington, recounted an angry phone call on January 6th between Mr. Trump and then-House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy; Mr. McCarthy, news reports at the time indicated, later shared details of the phone call with certain members of the House Republican caucus. 

“When McCarthy finally reached the president on Jan. 6 and asked him to publicly and forcefully call off the riot, the president initially repeated the falsehood that it was Antifa that had breached the Capitol,” Beutler said...“McCarthy refuted that and told the president that these were Trump supporters. That's when, according to McCarthy, the president said: ‘Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are.’”

CNN reported that multiple Republicans confirmed the contents of the phone call.

https://www.denver7.com/news/national/gop-representative-confirms-heated-phone-call-between-trump-mccarthy-amid-insurrection

What is (at least to me) most striking about the phone call with Mr. McCarthy is how quickly Mr. Trump turned on a dime, when challenged by Mr. McCarthy: he went from promoting a lie--that Antifa supporters were behind the insurrection--to immediately abandoning the lie, and then praising the rioters ("Well, Kevin, I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are"). 

Other still-startling and alarming remarks by Mr. Trump concerned those who were, during the insurrection, threatening his Vice President, Mike Pence; gallows, of course, had been built in conjunction with the threats.

In March 2021, Mr. Trump gave an interview to ABC journalist Jonathan Karl--details of which were released in November of that year, a few days in advance of the publication of a book by Mr. Karl, Betrayal: The Final Act of the Trump Show. During the 2021 interview, Mr. Trump was asked by Mr. Karl about the rioters' chants, on January 6th, threatening the Vice President.  

Mr. Trump, in the interview--which Mr. Karl recorded--appeared to excuse, justify, the threats.

Jonathan Karl:  Were you worried about [Vice President Pence] during that siege? Were you worried about his safety?

Trump: No, I thought he was well-protected, and I had heard that he was in good shape.  No, because I had heard he was in very good shape. But, but--no, I think--

Karl: Because you heard those chants, that was terrible, I mean, you know, those--

Trump:  He could have--well, the people were very angry.

In responding, "well, the people were very angry," Mr. Trump obviously knew what chants Mr. Karl was referring to.  The conversation continued:

Karl: They were saying "Hang--

Crosstalk:  Karl: --Mike Pence."  Trump: Because it's--

Trump: --it's common sense, Jon, it's common sense, that you're supposed to protect--how can you--if you know a vote is fraudulent, right?, how can you pass on a fraudulent vote to Congress? 

Mr. Trump, it is clear, cared nothing about the threats to the Vice President's life.  

Mr. Trump had prepared his supporters, during the 2020 campaign, for what he claimed would be a fraudulent election--in part, no doubt, because many polls, during the course of the campaign--public polls, and, it has been reported, internal polls conducted by his campaign--suggested he was trailing Joe Biden.

On August 17, 2020--months before the election--Mr. Trump told a Wisconsin audience that "the only way we're going to lose this election is if the election is rigged." 

He had made the same argument during his first presidential campaign: "I'm afraid the election's going to be rigged," he  told an audience in Ohio, on August 1, 2016. The same day, he said this on Fox News: "I'm telling you, November 8, we'd better be careful, because that election is going to be rigged."

Two months later, in October of 2016, Chuck Todd of NBC News said the following, about Mr. Trump's predictions of a rigged outcome: "This is a way to not look like a loser, this is going to be Donald Trump defining victory in his own way."  Mr. Todd said: "One thing he'll never admit [to is] losing or failing at anything."

One guesses that Mr. Trump will also never abandon his routinely incendiary rhetoric.

In May of 2024, during a private donor event in Florida, Mr. Trump said this, about the Biden administration, as reported on the NBC News website:

Donald Trump compared President Joe Biden’s administration to the secret police force of Nazi Germany in remarks at a private, closed-door donor retreat on Saturday afternoon.

The former president’s comments came as he was talking about his legal troubles, attacking the prosecutors in the cases and bemoaning the recent indictments in Arizona of several of his former top aides, along with 11 so-called fake electors from the 2020 election.

“These people are running a Gestapo administration,” Trump said, according to audio of the luncheon provided to NBC News. “And it’s the only thing they have. And it’s the only way they’re going to win in their opinion.” 

Mr. Trump posted the following--all of it in shouting-style caps, on his social media platform, on Memorial Day, May 29, 2023. Note that in this post--as in the November, 2023 speech in New Hampshire, cited above--he referred to the putative dangers to our country from within:

HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY TO ALL, BUT ESPECIALLY TO THOSE WHO GAVE THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE FOR THE COUNTRY THEY LOVE, AND TO THOSE IN LINE OF A VERY DIFFERENT, BUT EQUALLY DANGEROUS FIRE, STOPPING THE THREATS OF THE TERRORISTS, MISFITS AND LUNATIC THUGS WHO ARE WORKING FEVERISHLY FROM WITHIN TO OVERTURN AND DESTROY OUR ONCE GREAT COUNTRY, WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN IN GREATER PERIL THAN IT IS RIGHT NOW. WE MUST STOP THE COMMUNISTS, MARXISTS AND FASCIST "PIGS" AT EVERY TURN AND, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

There was also this, in April of this year, from CNN.com, regarding a lengthy interview Mr. Trump had given to Time magazine:

Former President Donald Trump wouldn’t dismiss the potential for political violence from his supporters if he isn’t elected in November, suggesting it would depend on the outcome of the presidential race.

“I don’t think we’re going to have that,” the presumptive GOP nominee told Time magazine. “I think we’re going to win. And if we don’t win, you know, it depends. It always depends on the fairness of an election.” 

That's his anticipatory excuse--or, his threat: It depends.

Monday, July 22, 2024

A piece by Jon Meacham, in The New York Times

The essay, from July 22nd, is titled, "Joe Biden, My Friend and an American Hero."

Mr. Meacham is a highly-regarded historian. He has also served, during the Biden presidency, as a sometimes-advisor to the President--such as, assisting in the writing of some of Mr. Biden's speeches. 

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/22/opinion/joe-biden-american-hero.html?unlocked_article_code=1.9U0.JmhA.2zwVnkhP-Qd1&smid=url-share

Sunday, July 21, 2024

Joe Biden's decision

I really love Joe Biden.  He is a man of great substance, and consequence.  He is honorable, moral, thoughtful, exceedingly smart, patriotic, determined; he is devoted to his family, and his faith, and is a man of great feeling. 

He has had, in many ways, an unusually accomplished presidency.  I'm extremely saddened by what has taken place--his exit from his re-election campaign---yet I believe he made the right decision, for the country. 

Here is the full letter which he released today, addressing his decision. 

https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2024/07/GTB11JnW8AAhCDP.png

Thursday, July 11, 2024

Disputing a story

There's a story which has recently made news--in mainstream media outlets, but which has also, certainly, been promoted by conservative outlets.  

The story has, I believe, been inaccurately reported. It has--very quickly, and very unfortunately--taken on the character of an urban myth.

The matter involves this: the claim that in a recent interview with a radio host on a Black-oriented Philadelphia station, President Biden said that he was "the first Black woman to serve with a Black president."

The New York Times--a paper whose journalism I admire tremendously; my day would not be complete without reading the Times--employed the quote, in a news story by reporter Michael D. Shear, on July 4th. 

Mr. Shear wrote: "Mr. Biden made the mistake...as he tried to deliver a line that he has repeated before about having pride in serving as vice president for President Barack Obama."

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/04/us/politics/biden-election-campaign.html?unlocked_article_code=1.6U0.4UBW.ZgGl8eTtmmO5&smid=url-share

The widely-read Times columnist Maureen Dowd subsequently cited the "first Black woman" quote from Mr. Shear's story, in a July 7th column.

The reported quote--in that it appeared in the midst of questions about Mr. Biden's mental acuity--has felt particularly inflammatory.

I have listened, many times (with headphones), to the part of the interview in which Mr. Biden is alleged to have made the above remark.  Here is a recording of what he said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mp6q_acgbMQ

I will not say this with 100% certainty--but will claim something close to certainty: that President Biden did not say what has been reported.

My argument about this issue in large part comes down to two words.  The first is the word "to" (as used in the reported quote, "to serve"). 

The word "to" connects the first phrase, "the first Black woman," to the next part of the sentence, "to serve with a Black president."   

The "to," I believe, does not belong in the sentence; I am simply not hearing it in the audio of the interview.  

The second word is "serve."  In listening to the President's remarks, I believe the word, as used by Mr. Biden, was likely, in fact, the word "served"--past tense.

It is true that Mr. Biden has a tendency to rush through some of his sentences, and, sometimes speaks in a kind of shorthand.  I think he was doing both, during this particular moment in the interview with the Philadelphia radio host.

To be sure: the comments Mr. Biden made were a bit disjointed. Yet I think those focusing upon them should have taken far greater care in listening to--and reporting upon--what he said.

In presenting, below, what I think Mr. Biden was in actuality saying, during the radio interview, I have, as suggested above, removed the crucial (and I believe inaccurately included) word "to" from the phrase "to serve," as it appeared in the Times report.  I have also replaced the word "serve" with "served."

Please note, as well, that near the start of the remarks in question, Mr. Biden used the phrase "as I said"; he was clearly, at this moment, seeking to repeat, summarize, part of his previous remarks.

Indeed, as Michael Shear wrote in his Times story: "Earlier in the interview, [Mr. Biden] boasted about appointing the first Black woman to the Supreme Court and picking the first Black woman to be vice president."

So: here is what I believe the President said, and was attempting to say, in his shorthand style. I have interpolated one phrase, in italics and within brackets (for purposes of clarity, regarding what I believe was Mr. Biden's clear intention), and have made note, also in brackets, of a moment in the audio recording which is garbled. 

Here are the remarks:

“By the way, I'm proud to be, as I said--[the person who chose] the first vice president, first Black woman.  Served with a Black president.  I'm proud of the [audio briefly unclear] first Black woman to the Supreme Court.”

Do I think Mr. Biden said he was the first Black woman to serve with a Black president?  No.

Do I believe that the Times report--and other news and opinion outlets addressing Mr. Biden's comments--got the story wrong?  Yes.

Tuesday, July 9, 2024

The legendary S.S. United States: is the end approaching?

On July 3, 1952--72 years ago last week--the ocean liner S.S. United States began its maiden voyage, from New York Harbor to Southampton, England.  

The ship--over 100 feet longer than the Titanic--was taken out of service seventeen years later, in 1969. Its ownership subsequently changed hands a few times, through the years.  In 1996, most of its interior having been gutted, it was moved to a berth on the Philadelphia waterfront, where it has since remained. I was given a tour of the ship in 2000, by a representative of Edward Cantor, its then-owner.  

I've written periodically about the ship, in this space, in that it plays a part in my book about early television. 

Five days before its 1952 maiden voyage, the NBC program Your Hit Parade was telecast from throughout the ship. The show was the television program's last broadcast of the 1951-1952 season. The telecast was also my mother's last appearance on the program.

New York Times story, June 22, 1952

 




Hit Parade rehearsal photo, on S.S. United States, June, 1952; bandleader Raymond Scott, center, conducting the Lucky Strike Orchestra.  Announcer Andre Baruch stands at left side of photo.

 




Hit Parade Dancers, including Virginia Conwell and Lenny Claret (center couple), rehearsing on deck of S.S. United States, June, 1952  
NBC cameraman at S.S. United States, rehearsal photo, June, 1952


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From 2003 to 2009, the ocean liner was owned by Norwegian Cruise Line, which had acquired the ship from owner Edward Cantor's estate, after Mr. Cantor's 2002 death. The cruise line planned on rehabilitating the ship, and making it seaworthy again; the plan was later abandoned .  

In 2011, following a $3 million gift from Philadelphia philanthropist H.F. "Gerry" Lenfest, the S.S. United States Conservancy, a group devoted to the ship's history, and its preservation, bought the ship, and has sought, for years, to find ways to repurpose it.  The Conservancy has contemplated turning the ship into a mixed-use site--such as, say, a stationary hotel, along with other hospitality, event, and museum spaces. The efforts have not been successful.

S.S. United States, at its Philadelphia waterfront berth, 2000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A June court decision handed the Conservancy a victory, but also a significant defeat.  The organization had been in litigation with the ship's waterfront landlord, Penn Warehousing and Distribution, which in 2021 doubled the daily $850 rental fee for the ship's berth on the Delaware River.  The Conservancy refused to pay the higher rent, arguing, as a USA Today story reported, "that their lease...had no provisions for sudden and unilateral rent hikes."

The Federal Judge hearing the case agreed, regarding the rental issue--but also ordered that the ship leave its waterfront berth by this September 12th.

The Conservancy has therefore undertaken a fundraising campaign to find a new home for the ocean liner--temporarily, or permanently, largely in the East, and the Mid-Atlantic region. If a new site cannot be found, the Conservancy may be forced to sell the historic ship for scrap--or, have the ship sunk, to create an artificial reef.  

Here is the Facebook page for the Conservancy:

https://www.facebook.com/SSUSC

(1952 S.S. United States photos, © Lost Gold Entertainment, Inc.; 2000 photograph of ship, © Jenny Lynn)

(The above piece was lightly edited, in the hours after its posting.)

Sunday, July 7, 2024

An unfortunate July 4th editorial decision

I watch (and like) a lot of CNN news coverage and commentary--but was taken aback on July 4th (though not entirely surprised) by a regrettable on-air decision the network made.  I have seen this occur before, on both CNN and MSNBC--when each network has covered certain live events, such as presidential speeches. 

There have been occasions, on both networks, when the hosts, and their panels/guests, have kept talking, as a particular live event has approached--and because of this, the very beginning of the event has been missed. 

On Thursday, Pamela Brown was hosting the network's early evening program; this was a little after 6 p.m. (Eastern time). In a corner of the screen, one saw speeches underway at The White House, as part of an event for active-duty military service members and their families, in commemoration of July 4th.

First, one saw the First Lady, Dr. Jill Biden, speaking; President Biden was standing to the side of, and behind, her.  Pamela Brown said:  "Dr. Jill Biden, the First Lady, is speaking. Are we going into, to listen to her? Okay. Sorry. My producer is talking to me in my ear..."   

In that the First Lady is obviously a crucial figure concerning the question of whether President Biden will continue as a candidate for re-election, it seemed to me the network should have aired her comments (or, at least, some part of them).

The producer, evidently, conveyed to Ms. Brown that her studio interviews should continue. Then, in the corner of the screen, one saw that Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin was speaking.  At this point, I wondered why the network did not simply switch to the event. Clearly, the President would be speaking soon.

Then Ms. Brown said: "All right, we have to go to a quick break. We're waiting for President Biden to speak there at the podium. We'll be right back."

The commercial began; it was for Easter Seals. And then, during the commercial, CNN's "Breaking News" animation and music appeared, and Ms. Brown said:  "All right. President Biden is speaking now at the podium."

And so, one watched Mr. Biden's remarks--but his initial words had been missed. 

According to the White House transcript of the event, this was the beginning of what the President said:

Happy Independence Day!  (Applause.)  At least the rain helped the humidity a little bit.

Jill and I, Secretary Austin, Mrs. Austin, we’re honored so many of your families are here on this special day.  I re- — really mean it. 

You represent only 1 percent — not quite 1 percent of the American population, but you keep 99 percent of the rest of the population safe.  It’s you.  You’re all volunteers.  You do it. 

According to the CNN "rush" transcript of its program, the airing of the President's remarks began here: "--of the American population, but you keep 99 percent of the rest of the population safe.  It’s you.  You’re all volunteers.  You do it.

This was an easily avoidable mistake on CNN's part, considering the significance, right now, of President Biden's public appearances, and his public remarks.  I don't believe Ms. Brown was at fault, here. The decision, I am guessing, likely rested with either the program's producer, or director--or, maybe, with a CNN executive. Or perhaps the network has a policy of only airing the President's comments, at such events, as opposed to also including any prefatory speeches; if this is the case, then I think the policy should be relaxed.

It is moments like these when a network such as CNN should take a cue from C-SPAN: let a public event--or at least part of it, when appropriate--unfold on its own. On CNN (and on MSNBC, as well-- which was not covering the White House event that night; a special was airing at the time), hosts and guests do not need to be continuously talking--right up to the moment, say, when the President begins speaking.  I would like to have heard, on July 4th, Dr. Biden's and Secretary Austin's remarks--though, at the very least, would have appreciated hearing even just some of the Secretary's comments, and then, immediately afterwards, the entirety of what the President said.  But CNN made the unfortunate decision to have its host (and guests) continue talking--and then, to make matters worse, aired a commercial at just the wrong time.  This decision did a disservice to CNN's viewers.

Thursday, July 4, 2024

Happy Independence Day

I've posted a link to the recording, below, on previous July 4ths. 

It is of Frank Sinatra singing "America the Beautiful." 

The recording is from the 1963 album The Concert Sinatra; the album's songs were arranged and conducted by Nelson Riddle. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0xC9xFuBvo

Here is one detail from the song, which I especially enjoy; it concerns Mr. Sinatra's lyrical/musical phrasing (which is, certainly, often commented upon).

It is heard at approximately 44 seconds from the song's start.

Mr. Sinatra sings:

America, America, God shed his grace on thee...

Yet, in his exquisitely distinctive way, he adds a pause between the words "grace," and "on"--which, I think, adds a subtle, after-the-fact emphasis to the word "grace."

America, America, God shed his grace (pause) on thee...

I love this brief pause (in addition to the overall superb rendition of the song).

Tuesday, July 2, 2024

Judicial vertigo

Yesterday's Supreme Court decision regarding presidential immunity is deeply distressing, and dizzying.

Here is an essay by the Editorial Board of The New York Times. The piece is titled: "The Supreme Court Gives a Free Pass to Trump and Future Presidents."

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/01/opinion/supreme-court-presidential-immunity-trump.html?unlocked_article_code=1.4U0.ZQwL.tV3OAWRwqS5H&smid=url-share